26th September 2012: May you be written down in your own special colour

In the beginning there were no colours, there was only light and dark, because God hadn’t thought about colours yet. Later, God thought about life, and soon after thought about death, as a way to get old life to get out of the way of new life. And life went on and evolved into consciousness, and God was sad, because it was too late to undo death, and so conscious people had to die, and still there were no colours.

So God made a book where the names of all conscious people were written, and every year the conscious people fasted to take notice of their lives and to take notice of the fact that they were going to die, and every year God took notice of each of them and marked down the ones who were going to die that year. Then, one day, as one of the people took notice and fasted and God thought about them and wrote their name, God loved that person so much (because they were so very very wonderful) that God thought up the first colour, to write down their name. (It was red. If I’d been God, it would have been blue, but in fact everyone agrees it was red.) After that red spread out through the world, getting on sunsets and strawberries and autumn leaves.

As time went on, there were more especially marvellous people for whom God made colours and let the colours out to run through the world, blue getting into the sky and yellow getting into the sun and on and on. Some say there were three, and others say seven people, and others say two hundred and fifty six, but we pity those poor misguided schismatics and say there were an infinite number of people and an infinite number of subtle colours, and God isn’t done with this project yet.

So on the first day of the year look carefully, look widely, look at the world with care so that you’ll notice if there’s a new colour. You won’t know if it’s your colour. (Nobody knows that, and we will have nothing to do with the heresies that try to connect specific people with specific colours.) But when we like people, when we see people who are amazing and wonderful, we say “God will make a special colour to write down your name!”

And we’ll be talking about you specifically when we say that.

(This is for Debbie Notkin and was posted as a response to her journal entry but it’s also in response to everything else on my reading list this morning. And it’s absolutely typical of me that I can’t think of a new mythological thing without immediately thinking of the heretical and schismatic versions of it.)

Posted in Whimsy

12th June 2012: Shakespeare, real thing

When I compared Martin’s A Dance With Dragons to Shakespeare’s history plays, some people got all bent out of shape by the comparison, and it took me ages to understand why. I was indeed comparing Martin to Shakespeare, because they were doing some of the same things, and using some of the same history to do things in different ways. I was comparing what Martin’s doing with council scenes and with the Wars of the Roses to what Shakespeare does with them. (The key play for ASoI&F is the three part Henry VI. Martin has clearly been influenced by it.)

To me, though, Shakespeare is a writer whose work I know, like all the other writers whose work I know. He’s amazingly good, but he’s also a real writer who made choices and dealt with material. But the people who huffily said it was ridiculous of me to compare Martin to Shakespeare know literally nothing about Shakespeare except that he was wonderful. They thought that by making the comparison I was saying that Martin was superlatively good, as good as Shakespeare, because that’s really all that Shakespeare means to them, excellence in literature. They have heard of Shakespeare, and they know he’s marvellous, but he’s entirely out of their own experience. They are like Keats before he read Chapman’s Homer, “oft of one wide expanse had I been told…”

So now I understand their reaction, and hope they manage to encounter some Shakespeare soon.

Posted in Books, Theatre

30th April 2012: Home From Jo March’s Europe

I am home, having spent the last week walking my feet off in Florence and Rome. What I said about Florence last time still very much holds. This time I wasn’t alone with Ada but joined by Z and A and Greer Gilman and we all had a delightful time. I have bought a tapestry, and Z says that the only thing better than owning a tapestry is being aware that he will one day inherit a tapestry. He says he doesn’t care if he never sees another Annunciation, but he loves Florence.

At one point Greer and I were talking about Little Women and Jo March’s desire to see Europe and I remembered something. When I was a child infuriated by Aunt March’s perfidy in taking Amy instead I realised all at once that I was in Europe. I mean I wasn’t in a bit of Europe where any C.19 Americans would have wanted to visit on their Grand Tour, I was in Aberdare, but all the same and even so. I was in Europe where Jo March so very much wanted to be. I could be in Europe for her.

On Friday we went to visit Brother Guy Consolmagno at Alba Longa (or Castel Gandolfo as they call it these days) and we saw the observatory — with a moon rock and a number of meteorites and a rosary made by TNH all in the same case. Then we walked through the papal gardens. There are olive trees and Roman pines and a formal Italian garden with fountains and hedges and statues, and there are the genuine Roman ruins of Domitian’s summer palace among the telescopes of Jesuit astronomers. A was sketching a fountain and I thought that right then I was in the layered complex older civilization that Jo March longed for. That fountain, the ruined theatre behind it, that sunlight through those trees…

We carry ourselves forward, and we carry them with us. Some of them are dead and some of them are imaginary, and they can’t see what we so badly want them to see and we can’t even send them postcards letting them know we wished they were there. But we were there, for ourselves, for them, for you, for the past and the present and the future.

And furthermore, we need to make things and be excited about the things other people make and keep building the possibility that the future might be even more beautiful than the past and have spaceships in it.

Posted in Books, Human culture, Life as it blossoms out in a jar or a face

26th January 2012: The Unknown Ocean

I was starting to think the Pacific was a myth. I got a real understanding of the wild surmise.

First, that wasn’t the Pacific, that was only Puget Sound. (But Puget Sound was wonderful.) Then it was only San Francisco Bay. Then we should have seen it from the Coast Starlight, but it was running very late and it was too dark to see anything by the time we got to the coast.

Our first day in Los Angeles we got onto a metro with the word “beach” in the name of its destination and then we walked and we walked and we walked and we couldn’t even catch a glimmer of ocean in the distance before we had to head back or be late for the reading. LA is too big and too spread out. It just doesn’t feel like a place. Phenomenal number of palm trees though. (The reading was OK — only 8 people, smallest one yet, but a very high quality of people.)

After asking advice from Sherwood Smith, the next day we got a bus to Santa Monica, where there is ocean and a “park”, i.e. a beach that’s accessible to the public. Even there we had to walk and walk and cross a scary highway bridge, but two hours each way on buses got us an hour at the ocean and back just in time to take the train to Albuquerque.

It was worth it, because I wanted to see the Pacific, and we have some pictures to prove it, which I will link to as soon as Z does the Flickr thing. It was also worth it because I love the sea, and because it was the sea and that was worth finding out. (Though as Z said as we headed disconsolately back on the metro the first day “Because long train trips was the one thing we didn’t already have enough of…”)

Ways Santa Monica is just like beaches I’ve been to in Britain:

1) a pier and tacky tourist stuff.
2) The sea itself, coming in and out in waves.
3) Wet sand by the sea, dry sand up above.
4) The sea is generally to the west.*

Ways in which it is different:

1) The sun is shining and it is +21. (I would add “in January”, but this is unusual in Britain in any month.)
2) The sea doesn’t warm up even after you’ve been in it for a while.
3) The vast majority of the shells in the sand are alive!
4) Palm trees.

* I have seen the Other Side of the Sea, the Atlantic coast of the US, but I have never been to a beach there. Nor have I been to beaches on the east coast of the UK.

Posted in Life as it blossoms out in a jar or a face, Whimsy

13th January 2012: Puget Sound

It wasn’t so much a look of wild surmise when I gazed at the Pacific. Or maybe it was, actually, a genuine one.

The Empire Builder was absoloutely on time — I haven’t been on a train more than half an hour late this trip, good old Amtrak has been operating just the way I like to think of it, slow but comfortable and reliable, far and away the best way to see the US. We left Minneapolis on Tuesday night and spent Wednesday going through the ever fascinating ever-changing landscapes of North Dakota and Montana. If people tell you there is nothing there, they must have been driving. On the train you are high up and can see how the bones of the landscape change and how the settlement patterns change. It’s entirely different from either the Canadian prairies or what I think of as the John Denver prairies further south. Also, it’s winter, which changes everything.

To Z’s intense and almost palpable frustration it got dark before the Rockies were more than a line on the horizon. I went to sleep before the moon rose, but he assures me it was worth waiting for and he saw some mountains, When we woke up and it got light we were in the Cascades, a mountain range sufficiently beautiful and snowcapped for me. Z couldn’t believe there were mountains that big that he hadn’t even heard of. This continued. Later yesterday, Velma told us that people used to worship Mount Rainer as a god, and Z immediately said that he was converted.

So, as you know Bob, the sun comes up in the east. This means it comes up behind the mountains, and so when you’ve just come through them the sky is light a long long time before you see the sun, which gives the most interesting kind of pastel light on a clear day, which yesterday was and today also bids fair to be. In that wonderful light we came out of a station in a little place called Everett and suddenly the train was running alongside the sea, with another awesome range of snowcapped mountains in the distance and a wooded island, Close up there was sea and rocks, and in the middle ground was sea and islands, and further off were these snowcapped peaks. It was breathtaking. Nobody had warned me, which in retrospect was very nice of you because I’d rather have the surprise and I’m sorry if I’ve spoiled it for anyone. It was far and away the most beautiful place I’ve seen in North America, and it compares well with Greek islands at dawn and the Scottish Highlands.

So I think it was probably more a look of delighted awe than wild surmise, but I can’t be sure. I can’t even be sure about Z’s expression, because we were both staring out of the window, transfixed.

[ETA: everyone told me Puget Sound isn’t the Pacific. Ah well.]

Posted in Life as it blossoms out in a jar or a face, Whimsy

1st December 2011: 47 Today

Great birthday so far — Rysmiel and I went out for a very good meal last night at a new place called French Connection Montreal, which I discovered by the simple method of reading their menu while waiting for a bus. They do a six course tasting menu and they’re really great about allergies. So I had six delicious courses of French food. The lowest points were really pretty good, and the high points were astonishing, including oysters with pomegranate seeds and lime, and chicken stuffed with sanglier in the style of maki. Amazing. The plan for today is that Z and A are coming over for dinner and present opening this evening. Because Z’s working rather odd hours he will have just got up!

Novels

Among Others Tor, January

Short Stories

“The Panda Coin” Eclipse 4, April

Poetry

The Weatherkeeper’s Diary Stone Telling 3, March

Sappho Beyond Hades Stone Telling 3, March

Serenissima, Strange Horizons, April

When We Were Robots in Egypt Tor.com, April

Secular Humanist Hymn Moral Relativism Magazine, July

Sold but not yet published

What Makes This Book So Great essay collection

Award Nominations

Seiun Award for Small Change books

Posted in Life as it blossoms out in a jar or a face, Writing

30th June 2011: Florence, a trip report and a plan

What I suggest you do is arrive at Florence by train around sunset. You’ll be flying into Rome, so that’s easy to arrange — the train from the airport takes you to Termini, the same railway station where you’ll get the train to Florence, and there are trains all the time so you can quite easily time it right. The advantage of this is that you’ll see the city for the first time as dusk is falling, and you’ll walk past the Duomo and the Baptistry and should get to the Palazzo Vecchio just as the sky turns that amazing Mediterranean night-blue that you see in Books of Hours, and all the glass in the windows turns that same colour. You’ll see it every night, of course, but it’s important to see it early.

If you’re not lucky enough to be staying with Thrud in her apartment at the top of a twelfth century tower parallel with the bells of the Duomo, you’ll want to find a hotel that’s as central as possible. In any case, dump your bags and keep walking, walk across the Ponte Vecchio and have dinner at the Trattoria Bordino. Have the truffle pasta. Have the Florentine steak — it’s a huge piece of excellent steak, cooked like seared tuna, so that the outside is well done and the centre is rare and as you eat it you have steak in all its forms. The other really good place to eat on that side of the river is Gusta Osteria — it’s cheaper, and the food is also wonderful — truffle pasta, again, and cheese with honey, and crostini.They also have their own wine made with their own grapes. The food in Florence is just unbelievably great.

After dinner you can walk back over the Ponte Vecchio, saying hello to the bust of Cellini and admiring the closed gold shops, and back past the Palazzo Vecchio. Have a gelato before bed — go to the absolutely awesome Perche No! near Orsan Michele. You can eat it sitting on the steps opposite Doubting Thomas or walk back and eat it in the piazza looking at the Palazzo Vecchio, but it will be too late to watch the sky darkening by then. You can do that on the other nights, looking for the first star that dares to shine on Florence.

The thing about Florence is that it’s all of a piece. It’s beautiful, and it’s all medieval and Renaissance. There’s Etruscan stuff, but nothing really Roman, and nothing post-Renaissance either, because at the time when normal people were knocking things down to build eighteenth and nineteenth century buildings, Florence was already a highlight of Grand Tours and inspiring those buildings. The newer stuff is all outside the old city walls. Inside the old walls (which aren’t there any more, although the gates are) it’s all walkable, and there are hardly any cars. There are two street numbering systems, based on whether the building was commercial or residential in the sixteenth century. This is confusing, especially as they may not be the same now — zoning never works — but it’s traditional. All the buildings, the little shops, the hotels, the restaurants, the houses, are Renaissance or earlier. If you’re used to seeing ruined castles and abbeys, although you know they’ve been ruined by Cromwell and the Reformation you subconsciously think they’ve been ruined by time. They haven’t. They just haven’t been kept up. Florence has all the hallmarks of medieval stone architecture, but it’s been constantly lived in. If they abandoned it the roofs would fail and plants would eat the mortar and it would all fall down, but then so would your house, and probably considerably faster. It’s weird to walk into a pizza place that’s clearly barrel vaulted, but you get used to it. It’s all that old. The Uffizi and the churches you have come to see are the newest things here. Italy has never been conquered by people who didn’t secretly admire it. This shows.

Thrud’s a Renaissance woman. She’s spending a year in Florence to do research on Marsilio Ficino, the translator of Plato and one of the people who helped kickstart the Renaissance. (I love the expression on Florentine’s faces when she tells them she’s there to work on Ficino. They smile a little private delighted smile.) She’s a Renaissance woman in the other sense too, as well as publishing academic works she has written novels, she writes, sings, and performs music, she paints frescos, makes clothes. She’s one of the coolest people I know, and I know a lot of cool people. She’s the perfect person for me to be with in Florence, because she knows so much about it and because her mind meshes so well with mine. We spent a week having a great conversation about art and history and allegory and beauty and philosophy. You know the way really good conversation bounces? Nothing is more interesting than good conversation.

The patrons of Florence are Mars, John the Baptist and St Zenobius, and the symbols of Florence are David and the River Arno. (Can’t you imagine them arguing at committee meetings?) The language of Florence is a very Latinate Italian, extremely easy to read and fairly easy to understand once you have the rhythm of it but very hard to predict — I kept coming out with things that were half Latin and half French. Many people speak English, but then again wouldn’t you if addressed in half Latin and half French? With my language talents, it’s just as well that I was born speaking everyone’s second language.

Florence was never really feudal. After the Guelphs and the Ghibellines had finally sorted things out, the Ghibellines houses were flattened to make the space where the Palazzo Vecchio is, and the piazza in front of it, and the sculpture gallery to the side of it, where Michaelangelo’s David was made to stand (and a perfect copy stands still) and where Cellini’s Perseus holds Medusa’s head high and his sword ever ready. The Palazzo Vecchio is where the Florentine Republic (1115-1512) ran its government by the completely mad method of chosing names of eligible men from leather bags and shutting them up in the castle for two months with complete power, to be replaced by another eight men for the next two months. Meanwhile they hired a Podesta for a year, a younger son of a noble from elsewhere, who worked to run the police for the city and lived in the Bargello (now a lovely museum) and at the end of the year was exiled from Florence forever. The idea was to prevent tyranny. It’s crazy and it couldn’t possibly work and eventually (1434) it got taken over by the Medicis behind the scenes and then Savonarola (1494) and then (1512) the Medicis again as Grand Dukes of Tuscany. (But meanwhile it’s 2011, how well are your institutions doing at repelling tyranny?) You can go in and see Macchiavelli’s office, which they keep kind of quarantined. There are wonderful doors with portraits of Dante and Petrarch.

In the Pitti Palace, which was built by the Medici dukes, there’s a room that shows the decline and rebirth of the ancient world. There’s a fresco showing the ancient world being destroyed by a set of rather mythologically mixed monsters (harpies eating Pegasus) and one showing Lorenzo de’ Medici welcoming refugee muses to Florence, and another of him surrounded by sculptuors and artists and Ficino, with an inset in which Truth is dispelling any doubts Lorenzo might have about the reconcilation of the pagan world with the bible. The last panel shows a swan drawing a medal of Lorenzo out of the water, but in the corner are the fates, spinning and weaving and cutting as always, and that wall connects on to the wall where time and monsters are destroying civilization and everyone is weeping over the lost books.

I had the reaction to that room that people are supposed to have to religious paintings — a great affirmation of my heart’s belief, and the recognition that other people have felt the same. I am only moved by religious art by an effort of imagination.

There was a lot wrong with the ancient world, and there was a lot that was ridiculous in the Renaissance view of it. But there are ways in which the Renaissance dream of Classical Antiquity is better than actual Classical Antiquity, because it leaves out the slavery and the armies and the injustice. It’s all about the art and learning. We too can look at history and keep the best of it while deploring the awful things. The Renaissance truly flowered in Florence, and while you’re there you can see work by Botticelli and Raphael and Michaelangelo and Leonardo and Cellini and Galileo and Donatello. You can see the Baptistry, with the mosaic of hell that Dante would have seen as a boy, with the doors Ghiberti designed — and in between doing the designs and doing the doors, Brunelleschi invented linear perspective, so the model doesn’t have it and the real doors do. You can see the neoclassical San Lorenzo that leads you to think about the soul of Cosimo de Medici, and the monastery of San Marco where every monk’s cell has an individual fresco by Fra Angelico. You can see the Duomo, which they started building in the confident hope that somebody would figure out how to build a dome that big before they got to it. (Brunelleschi did.) You can go to the Uffizi, which is a world class art gallery. (I suggest you become a friend of the Uffizi to avoid the queues. The membership also gets you in free to most of the other places you will want to go, and the Uffizi itself is too big to see in one day. You may well save money, and you’ll certainly save time, and if you end up spending a few extra Euros they will go for the preservation of art treasures, which is still a win.)

Best of all, everywhere in Florence you can see the physical evidence of a time and place where people were passionately excited and making things and inspiring each other and competing to make better things. They were rediscovering the works of antiquity and not just imitating them but surpassing them. They were just starting to discover science — you can see Galileo’s telescope, and Leonardo’s machines — and experimenting and learning and caring.

Right next to San Lorenzo, you can see the Laurentian Library, which at the time it was built held all of Western knowledge neatly laid out on reading shelves and lecterns designed by Michaelangelo. All the knowledge they were aware of would fit into that room, absolutely everything. Then after that there was a time when it wouldn’t all fit in even the biggest room in the world, and right now it all fits into your phone. What a wonderful modern age we live in! Florence doesn’t just tell you that people there had a Renaissance once. It shows you that having a Renaissance is a possible thing to reach for. So what I suggest is that when you come home from Florence we start to make things and show them to each other and have another Renaissance, starting here and now. OK?

Posted in Human culture

22nd May 2011: Layers

A little while ago I wrote a post on Tor.com about Thomas Disch’s On Wings of Song (1979). And I was thinking wow, 1979, but it doesn’t feel like a dated future, I wonder why that is? And I think it’s because it’s more layered than you usually see. I was thinking what else was like that, and I remembered Delany’s Nova (1968) and I thought, well, what do Disch and Delany have in common? They were both gay men in New York City. And because they were gay and lived in New York city in the sixties and seventies when it wasn’t socially acceptable to be gay, being gay in and of itself brought them into contact with men of all classes and ages, some of them hustlers, and it brought them into contact with them because they had something in common with them, not because they were out there researching. (“And how long have you been a peasant?”) And so Disch and Delany wrote futures that weren’t narrow and middle class and full of people all at the same stage of life, they wrote futures that had people of different ages and classes, they included these kinds of things in their work because they had them in their minds because they had them in their lives. They had a breadth of experience of people and the world that most of the SF writers of the time did not have, and they were better writers and wrote better more layered and more lasting futures because of it.

When Z was a toddler, I started to take him to mother-and-toddler groups. And I started to know people purely in my role as Z’s mum. And these people were all the same age, within a reasonable margin, but the vast majority of them were working class — nobody in their family had been to college and they or their partners were working blue collar jobs. And I suddenly realised that I hadn’t known any working class people for a while in there, that I’d almost forgotten about them. Oh, they gave me my change in shops and fixed my shower, but I hadn’t been interacting with them on a level where we had something in common. And that made me notice how people narrow down, how easy it is to only know people like you, people your sort of age and your sort of class — the people you work with, the people who share your interests. There are people who know no children, and parents who only know parents, and people who know no old people except their relatives. And I find that claustrophobic. And when I lived in Lancaster at the time I’m talking about, when Z was a toddler, I mostly hung out with a lot of bohemians and gamers and fans, and that’s what I’m saying was comparatively limited.

Hospital waiting rooms mix you up with everyone. C.S. Lewis talks about how parishes do, or are supposed to.

And so does public transit, because there you are out with everyone, hanging out at bus stops.

I have a number of bus stop friends. I mean people I regularly see at the bus stop and chat with. They are of all ages and classes. Lots of them are immigrants. (I am also an immigrant.) Lots of them are older people. At the moment I’m worried about the health of two of my bus stop friends who both fought in WWII on different sides — one of them fought in Mussolini’s army and the other with MacArthur.

Most of the people I meet at the bus stop I never see again. They don’t live in my neighbourhood, or else I’m at a bus stop in their neighbourhood. I’ve had some great conversations with these people. There was the woman whose ancestors came here via the Underground Railroad, and the woman who used to live above a mews, and the girl whose grandfather kept a pig on his balcony. I don’t elicit these stories. We generally start off with a conversation about when the bus is coming — or in the case of my friend who fought for Mussolini, about the weather. And then they will ask me where I am from, and I will tell them, and I will ask them where they are from and they will tell me, and before you know it we’re having a conversation about the Borgia popes or their cataract operation. And when they do live in my neighbourhood and I start to see them regularly, we become friends, we find ourselves catching each other up on our lives — their daughter’s getting married, my son is moving…

I don’t know their names and they don’t know mine. They’re a different kind of people from people I meet because we’re all interested in books, or Rysmiel’s work colleagues. They’re a broader range. They make my experience more layered, broader, more interesting.

And you may shudder and you may say no, this is why you love being insulated inside your car and never have to meet these people. Or you may ask if I don’t ever meet horrible people or boring people, and of course I do.

But for me transit isn’t just my only option for going anywhere, it’s also an interesting way I get to meet a broad range of people, in their natural environment, and on an equal basis.

Posted in Human culture, Writing

27th March 2011: In Dialogue With His Century

I was getting a book off the shelf last night and I came eye to eye with the hardcover of Patterson’s biography of Heinlein Robert A Heinlein: In Dialogue With His Century and I realised what a stupid title it is. Especially for Heinlein, who seemed to write things that went straight from the nineteenth century to the future without pausing for the present.

Twentieth Century: Cars, planes, electricity!

Robert A. Heinlein: The nineteenth century is over! Soon we will be going to the stars!

Twentieth Century: The depression, WWII!

Robert A. Heinlein: To the stars! First we’ll settle the solar system. Martians!

Twentieth Century: Cold war.

Robert A. Heinlein: Bomb shelters!

Twentieth Century: Boop, be doop, be doop, be doodle-ooo, boop, be boop, be boop, be doodle-ooo, boop, be doop, be doop, be doodle-eye-doo!

Robert A. Heinlein: The nineteenth century is over! Soon we can have sex with our mothers and our clones! Also, come on, hey, we haven’t even got to the moon yet, and I want to have sex with Martians!

Twentieth Century: Apollo XI. Done with space now. Boop be doop be doop…

Robert A. Heinlein: The stars!

Twentieth Century: Computers!

Robert A Heinlein: The stars! Also, more hot competent red-heads, are you listening?

Twentieth Century: If one of us isn’t listening, are you sure it’s me?

Posted in Books, Whimsy

26th March 2011: Things I know

I always know huge amounts more than end up on the page. I need to know it, and often I don’t have to think about knowing it, I just know it, it’s inherent in the world and it doesn’t end up being mentioned because it’s not necessary. But for any book or story or poem of mine, I know the whole matrix in which it is embedded. Sometimes there will be two words in a poem that I could expand on if I wanted to, that I could write pages and pages about because it’s there in my head. I don’t write the pages and pages. It’s not necessary to make them explicit, but it’s necessary to have them implicit or that word wouldn’t be the right word. I wouldn’t know the word if I didn’t know everything that underlies it.

One of the mode things I need to know before I start writing is the fulcrum feel of how the thing works, and that *never* all gets on the page.

Sometimes it’s easy to explain. Like Tooth and Claw, OK, once I had that insight that Trollope understands dragons and not humans then it went down like dominoes in my head, therefore cannibalism, therefore turning pink, Yarg conquest, religion, slavery, wing-bound parsons, female factory workers, emancipation, their very complicated method of government, all ending in fire in their WWI-equivalent. The method of government and the ending in fire and the female factory workers didn’t get into the book, and the emancipation barely did, but there they are. And sometimes, always, I’ll need to make up details and work out details, but within the space of the frame I have. And often I can’t explain it like this — I honestly worked out the whole Small Change universe between one paragraph of reading Brat Farrar (for the twentieth time) and the next. And some of it got onto the page.

OK, I have an example. In Sixpence, the unwritten story about Viola in 1971, the house she is living in has a huge screen of dark evergreens between the house and the road. There are rhododendrons too. If I were to write it (which isn’t going to happen) they might or might not get onto the page, depending. But I know that they are there. They are unchangable and fixed. The house is on the north-west side of Kendal, but if I had a good reason to put it near Oxenholme instead or further towards Windermere, or even right up in the Lakes, I could do that. That’s within what’s reasonably flexible until I start writing it. But I absolutely can’t change those dark evergreens, even though they might never be mentioned. Why are they required? Beats me. How do I know they are there? They came to me. Somebody asked me what happened to Viola, and I thought about it, and wham, there’s that house with the dark shrubs and trees, and the shoots of snowdrops and she’s married a doctor and got out of the nursing home (they don’t hang people like her) and she thinks the gardener’s boy is going to be an actor, but actually he’s going to be a poet.

Some things I have to work out. If I were going to write that, I’d have to work out ten more years of that alternate history — no thanks. But some things are just contained in the possibility of telling the story at all and that’s all there is to it — even though they might not be the things you need to write down.

Oh, and you can’t tell from outside. You can’t tell if something is something that had to be there or something I made up. You can’t tell if it’s something I know huge amounts more about. Well, except people, obviously. I mean almost every character could have their own book. But I think that’s normal. But if you see a shrub you don’t know if it’s an essential mode shrub or if I put it there for thematic reasons or just to fill a pause. And the same if you don’t see a shrub, come to think of it.

Posted in Small Change, Writing